Legal Opinion

Monsour v. Haddad

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1971No. 6478PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The appellants commenced this action in the district court against respondent Mike Haddad and his wife Adele, seeking to set aside, on the ground that it was a fraudulent conveyance, a certain deed of real property wherein Adele quitclaimed her interest therein to Mike. The court below granted Mike’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and the appellants have appealed from that order of dismissal, failing, however, to comply properly with Rule 54(b) of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides in part that when more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, the court…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilmurth v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1963

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. BaskinNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Consolidated Casinos Corp. v. L. A. Caunter & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Crescent v. WhiteNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Van Dyk v. EarlNevada Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API