Monsour v. Haddad
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The appellants commenced this action in the district court against respondent Mike Haddad and his wife Adele, seeking to set aside, on the ground that it was a fraudulent conveyance, a certain deed of real property wherein Adele quitclaimed her interest therein to Mike. The court below granted Mike’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and the appellants have appealed from that order of dismissal, failing, however, to comply properly with Rule 54(b) of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides in part that when more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, the court…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Wilmurth v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1963
4Cited by4 opinions
- King v. BaskinNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Consolidated Casinos Corp. v. L. A. Caunter & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Crescent v. WhiteNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Van Dyk v. EarlNevada Supreme Court · 1971