People v. Barraza
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward
The petitioner, attorney Fred M. Morelli, Jr., represented the defendant, Armando Barraza, at his trial conducted in absentia. After the defendant was convicted, the trial court disposed of the defendant’s bond, which had been forfeited, by allocating approximately one-third each to the petitioner’s attorney fees, the City of Aurora, and the County of Kane. The petitioner now appeals, claiming that he was entitled to have the full amount of his attorney fees paid from the defendant’s forfeited bond before any amount was allocated to the State. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MayaIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- The PEOPLE v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. EppingerIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. KellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- People v. KellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- People v. PinoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992