Legal Opinion

People v. Pino

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 11, 1992No. 1—90—1440Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

Petitioner Sam Adam (hereinafter petitioner) appeals from the trial court’s award of reasonable attorney fees for his representation of defendant Isis Pino (hereinafter defendant), who was tried and convicted in absentia on various drug charges. Upon review, petitioner argues that the trial court should have awarded him attorney fees in the full amount of defendant’s bail bond ($200,000). Petitioner asserts that this award would be appropriate, because defendant agreed, before she disappeared prior to trial, that petitioner would receive the full amount of her bail bond deposit as attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ParteeIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. MayaIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. BarrazaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API