Legal Opinion

Arthur Oates v. Discovery Zone, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 23, 1997No. 96-1205Published

1Opinion of the Court

116 F.3d 1161

75 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 21, 70 Empl.

Prac. Dec. P 44,769,

134 Lab.Cas. P 58,308

Arthur OATES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DISCOVERY ZONE, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-1205.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Jan. 8, 1997.

Decided June 23, 1997.

H. Candace Gorman (argued), Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John P. Morrison (argued), Joanne L. Hyman, Bell, Boyd & Lloyd, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Gwendolyn Young Reams, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, DC, Carolyn L. Wheeler, Paula R. Bruner (argued), C. Gregory…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API