Legal Opinion

In re the Appeal of Lord

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1919No. 1207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE JUSTICES.

This is an appeal to the justices of the supreme court from a ruling or decision of the auditor of the Territory of Hawaii as provided for in section 1406 R. L. 1915. Pursuant to call for tenders duly published the board of supervisors of the City and County of Honolulu on March 4, 1919, received and opened bids for the construction of Avhat is designated as the first unit of the belt road, Koolaupoko district, Island of Oahu. Two bids were submitted, one being that of the appellant E. J. *78Lord and the other of the Hawaiian Contracting Company, Limited. The board of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Maryland Pavement Co. v. MahoolCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  4. Wilson v. Lord-Young Engineering Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fitzgibbon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Appeal of ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API