Legal Opinion
MGM Court Reporting Service, Inc. v. Greenberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
In 1984, defendant Stanley Greenberg owned 40% and Michael Yesner owned 60% of the outstanding shares of plaintiff MGM Court Reporting Service, Inc. (MGM), a close corporation engaged in the business of providing stenographic reporting services. In August of that year, contending that Yesner had engaged in a campaign to freeze him out of MGM’s business, Greenberg commenced a proceeding seeking dissolution of the corporation pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a. In response, Yesner and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mohawk Maintenance Co. v. KesslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- MGM Court Reporting Service, Inc. v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ritani, LLC v. AghjayanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- CSI Group, LLP v. HarperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Titus & Donnelly, Inc. v. PotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Goldome Corporation v. WittigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Mitel Telecommunications Systems, Inc. v. NapolitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.