Legal Opinion
Wabash Ry. Co. v. Glass
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1929No. 5167PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in the court below, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, was injured in a daylight grade crossing accident on a heavily *698traveled crossing in the city of Ft. Wayne, Ind., when the automobile in which she was a passenger was struck by one of the defendant’s trains. There was substantial evidence at the trial tending to prove negligence on the part of the defendant in the employment of an inefficient and partially incapacitated crossing watchman, in permitting the gates at the crossing to become in disrepair and/or in failing to lower them upon approach of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Detroit United Ry. v. WeintrobeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Pennsylvania Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Landers v. Erie R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Erie R. Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Wabash Ry. Co. v. WalczakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Audirsch v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Pennsylvania R. v. ShindledeckerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Strider v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.