Legal Opinion

Matter of Nolan v. . Cranford Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 7, 1916, which affirmed an award of the state workmen’s compensation commission for the death of one William Nolan. ■ The defendant Cranford Company, which was engaged in the general trucking business, hired horses, wagons and drivers from one Kane, who paid the drivers their wages.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 7, 1916, which affirmed an award of the state workmen’s compensation commission for the death of one William Nolan. ■ The defendant Cranford Company, which was engaged in the general trucking business, hired horses, wagons and drivers from one Kane, who paid the drivers their wages. Nolan, one of the drivers so furnished, while driving a wagon under the direction and control of the Cranford Company, was accidentally killed. The question was as to whether the Cranford Company was…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hxscock, Chase, Collin, Cuddebaoic, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of De Noyer v. . CavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Famous Players Lasky Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Claim of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Lee v. Cranford Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API