Medford v. Pacific National Fire Insurance

On Petition for Rehearing

Before Lusk, Chief Justice, and Brand, Belt*, Rossman and Latourette, Justices.

Petition denied.

BRAND, J.

In our former opinion we held that the provisions of O. C. L. A., § 101-1609 did not control the method by which the policy on the plaintiff’s automobile might *647be canceled by the company. We further held that the provisions of the policy itself controlled the method by which it might be canceled. By a petition for rehearing the plaintiff contends that we erred in so holding and again urges that compliance with the provisions of O. C. L. A., § 101-1609 constituted…