Legal Opinion

Griffith v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 14, 1998No. 07-96-0140-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DODSON, Justice.

In a jury trial, appellant Russell Alan Griffith was convicted of sexual assault. The jury assessed his punishment at confinement for twenty years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. By three points of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in admitting State’s evidence regarding DNA testing involving a probability of paternity statistic using Bayes’ Theorem as violating the presumption of innocence, or in the alternative, the trial court erred in admitting such evidence without testimony on the mathematical applications of the test…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Roberson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. Butcher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Alfred Ivey Jr v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Abram Harker Jeffs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. Abram Harker Jeffs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API