Legal Opinion

Duluth Log Co. v. John C. Hill Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1910No. Nos. 16,337—(120)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $236.60, balance alleged to be due upon the purchase price of three carloads of No. 1 white cedar shingles. The allegations of the answer and reply are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Finehout, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law found in favor of defendant. From the judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

Plaintiff and appellant brought this action to recover the price of “three carloads of plaintiff’s No. 1 white cedar shingles,” sold to defendant and respondent. The answer alleges that the shingles were originally ordered to be delivered in carload lots to the North Star Lumber Company (for convenience hereafter to be referred to as the Lumber Company) at named places and points; that three carloads were shipped to certain points, and there delivered to the said Lumber Company; that two cars were accepted and paid for; but that the car delivered at Glencoe was not accepted, because of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGrath v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Georgia Refining Co. v. Augusta Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Hensen v. BeebeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Brown v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. . SchweitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Fiterman v. J. N. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. J. C. Boss Engineering Co. v. Gunderson Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Geo. J. Grant Construction Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  5. George J. Grant Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API