Legal Opinion

Geo. J. Grant Construction Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 9, 1926No. Docket No. 2584Published

1Opinion of the Court

*398OPINION.

Teussell :

A study of the language of the award of contract discloses that the petitioner was to receive for the construction of the reservoir a fixed and definite amount as compensation, and (hat amount was $194,158.01. It further discloses that the work of building the embankments was to be done on the basis of the cost plus 15 per cent but not to exceed a total amount of $51,896. It thus appears that the contractual relations entered into between the petitioner and the Board of Water Commissioners contemplated the performance of one piece of work for a fixed and determined amount,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. McGrath v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Stauff v. BingenheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Blake v. J. Neils Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API