Geo. J. Grant Construction Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*398OPINION.
Teussell :
A study of the language of the award of contract discloses that the petitioner was to receive for the construction of the reservoir a fixed and definite amount as compensation, and (hat amount was $194,158.01. It further discloses that the work of building the embankments was to be done on the basis of the cost plus 15 per cent but not to exceed a total amount of $51,896. It thus appears that the contractual relations entered into between the petitioner and the Board of Water Commissioners contemplated the performance of one piece of work for a fixed and determined amount,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- McGrath v. CannonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Stauff v. BingenheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Blake v. J. Neils Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.