Legal Opinion
Doe v. Santa Clara Pueblo
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 2007No. 29,350, 29,351PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
{1} In Gallegos v. Pueblo of Tesuque, 2002-NMSC-012, ¶ 10 n. 3, 132 N.M. 207, 46 P.3d 668, this Court left unanswered the question whether gaming compacts between the State of New Mexico and various New Mexico Pueblos that created concurrent jurisdiction in state courts over personal injury actions against tribal-owned casinos were valid and enforceable in light of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. § 2701 (2000). We now answer that question in the affirmative, holding that state courts have jurisdiction over personal injury actions filed against Pueblos…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Navajo Nation v. DalleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Mendoza v. Tamaya Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ping Lu v. Education Trust BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Martinez v. CITIES OF GOLD CASINONew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Pueblo of Santa Ana v. NashDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.