Legal Opinion

(SS) Amarante v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 5, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00556Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRODIE AMARANTE, Case No. 1:23-cv-00556-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS 13 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of 15 Social Security,1 (Docs. 16, 19) 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff Brodie Amarante (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 21 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance 22 benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The parties’ briefing on the motion…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Bray v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API