Legal Opinion
L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided July 19, 1972No. C.D. 4365; Port of New York, Court 68/26282-14083 on Metal ProductsPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Judge:
This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 8.2. The merchandise involved in this action is described on the commercial invoice accompanying the entry as “Half Bird Cage decoration Lamp Set small size with 4 lites and 1 spare bulb.” This merchandise, imported at New York from Hong Kong, was classified in liquidation under TSUS item 653.40 as illuminating articles at the duty rate of 19 per centum ad valorem. And it is al leged in the complaint that the merchandise should be classified under TSUS item 688.40 as electrical articles not specially…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Chung Wing Ping v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Ross Products, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. L. Batlin & Son, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Prestigeline v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- All Channel Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- American Motorists Insurance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Clairol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984