Legal Opinion
Alicia Paschall v. Amber Andrade and Julie Hardison
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided November 14, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00149Unknown
1Opinion
1 FILED IN THE 2 U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Nov 14, 2025 3 SEAN F. MCAVOY, CLERK 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 ALICIA PASCHALL, No. 2:25-CV-00149-RLP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 9 v. 10 AMBER ANDRADE and JULIE HARDISON, 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Alicia Paschall’s Third Amended Complaint, 13 ECF No. 24. Ms. Paschall appears pro se. Id. By separate Order the Court granted 14 Ms. Paschall leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. Defendants have not 15 been served. 16 LEGAL STANDARD 17 A plaintiff…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.