Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

HALL v. HARTMAN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 2021No. 2:20-cv-03235Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EARL HALL : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : DETECTIVE TIMOTHY HARTMAN, : DETECTIVE JOSEPH CREMEN : NO. 20-3235 MEMORANDUM OPINION Savage, J. July 1, 2021 After plaintiff Earl Hall was found not guilty for crimes in connection with the non- fatal shooting of Terrell Barnes, he brought claims for malicious prosecution under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Pennsylvania law.1 He contends that the defendants, acting with malice, lacked probable cause to prosecute him. The defendants, the two detectives who investigated the shooting and referred…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Raymond DufresneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API