Legal Opinion

Chaddick v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1983No. 2-2401-OZF453-3-0; CA 19377Published

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner, the prevailing party in Chaddick v. Adult and Family Services Division, 53 Or App 508, 632 P2d 33 (1981), seeks an award of an attorney fee pursuant to ORS 183.495.1 On the merits of the case, petitioner achieved a reversal of an AFSD order denying her benefits for a particular month due to the receipt of a lump sum payment of Social Security survivor’s benefits to one of her children. The reversal was pursuant to ORS 183.482(8) (a) (A):

“(8) (a) The court may affirm, reverse or remand the order. If the court finds that the agency has erroneously interpreted a provision of law and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Goldhammer v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Chaddick v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API