Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Utilities District v. Aquila, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2006No. S-05-127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha (MUD) appeals the district court’s order affirming a decision of the Nebraska Public Service Commission (PSC). The PSC ordered MUD to cease and desist construction of a gas main extension. Aquila, Inc., MUD’s competitor, filed a formal complaint with the PSC for a determination that MUD’s proposed extension was not in the public interest as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 57-1303 (Reissue 2004). The PSC found that MUD’s extension was not in the public interest and ordered MUD to cease and desist construction. Applying the factors set out in § 57-1303,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. StrussNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Becker v. Nebraska Accountability & Disclosure CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Zalkins Peerless Wip. v. NEB. EQUAL. OPP. COM'NNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McCray v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re Application of Metro. Util. Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turco v. SchuningNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Livengood v. Nebraska State Patrol Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Omaha Expo. & Racing v. Nebraska State Racing Comm.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. McDougle v. State ex rel. BruningNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. City of Omaha v. C.A. Howell, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API