Legal Opinion

McDougle v. State ex rel. Bruning

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2014No. S-12-1186PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets McDOUGLE v. STATE EX REL. BRUNING 19 Cite as

289 Neb. 19

CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. We remand the cause with direction to enter an order affirming the district court’s entry of summary judg- ment in favor of State Farm. R eversed and remanded with direction. Eric McDougle, LMHP, PLADC, appellant, v. State of Nebraska ex rel. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed September 12, 2014. No. S-12-1186. 1. Jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law for the court. 2. Statutes:…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beatrice Manor, Inc. v. Department of HealthNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Becker v. Nebraska Accountability & Disclosure CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ptak v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Anderson v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Application of Metro. Util. Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kozal v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Village at North Platte v. Lincoln Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Omaha Expo. & Racing v. Nebraska State Racing Comm.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Nebuda v. Dodge Cty. Sch. Dist. 0062Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. DantzlerNebraska Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API