Legal Opinion

Dort v. Nicken

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1889Published

Appeal from special term, Erie county. Action by Casper Dort against Eva Nicken, to compel her to execute a mortgage on land. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.

On the 26th day of May, 1875, this defendant and her husband, Adam Nicken, being the owners in fee of the premises described in the •complaint, executed and delivered to George Goetz and J. Martin Jones a mortgage upon said premises to secure the payment of $1,100, with interest, which mortgage was thereafter duly recorded in the clerk’s office in Erie ■county. The defendant is now the sole owner of the premises, having acquired the same by certain mesne conveyances. On the 10th day of November, 1887, there remained due and unpaid upon said mortgage the sum of $625. The mortgage was then held…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. v. . WalworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  2. Heermans v. . ClarksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Leslie v. . WileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API