Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. CRESCENT RIVER PORT PILOTS ASS'N

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided June 1, 2007No. Civil Action 06-3746PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motions.

I.BACKGROUND

This lawsuit arises from the attempts of plaintiff Michael R. Mitchell, an African-American man, to qualify for commission as a river port pilot. Mitchell alleges that, since 2001, he has been continuously denied the opportunity to fairly compete for a state appointment based on the discriminatory and unlawful practices of the named defendants in this matter.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of AlexandriaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2023
  2. Edwards v. Ochsner Clinic, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
  3. Ho v. Jefferson Financial Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API