Mitchell v. CRESCENT RIVER PORT PILOTS ASS'N
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motions.
I.BACKGROUND
This lawsuit arises from the attempts of plaintiff Michael R. Mitchell, an African-American man, to qualify for commission as a river port pilot. Mitchell alleges that, since 2001, he has been continuously denied the opportunity to fairly compete for a state appointment based on the discriminatory and unlawful practices of the named defendants in this matter.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clark v. City of AlexandriaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Edwards v. Ochsner Clinic, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
- Ho v. Jefferson Financial Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024