Legal Opinion

State v. Sylvester Hameline

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2008No. DA 06-0664PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶ 1 Sylvester Wayne Hameline (Hameline) appeals from the judgment entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, on his conviction and sentence for the offense of sexual intercourse without consent. We affirm.

¶2 Hameline raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in imposing conditions on Hameline’s sentence restricting his contact with children under the age of 18 and his access to pornographic materials?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in imposing an annual polygraph testing condition on Hameline’s sentence?

BACKGROUND

¶5 In September of 2005, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LenihanMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. KotwickiMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. AshbyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ImlayMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. FullerMontana Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. A.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  3. State v. WhalenMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. HeddingsMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API