Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McQuinn v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 13, 1994No. 1902-92-2Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenton, J.

I concur in the part of the opinion styled “Preservation of the Issue on Appeal." However, for the reasons that follow, I would reverse the conviction.

The evidence proved that one of McQuinn’s companions fired a gun at the victim, that McQuinn then fired the same gun at the victim, and that another of McQuinn’s companions then used the *426same gun to shoot and kill the victim. The victim’s father, who was not present at the incident, gave hearsay testimony over objection that he learned from a witness to the killing that “three guys either walked up to my son and demanded money or something.”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bridgeman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. Fortune v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  4. Moehring v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  5. Moran v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API