Bridgeman v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
Jimmy Lee Bridgeman appeals his jury trial conviction for incest, Code § 18.2-366, for which he was sentenced to five years in the penitentiary. Because we find the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to convict appellant of incest, we address only that issue.
The standard fór review of criminal convictions requires that we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, giving it all inferences fairly deducible therefrom. Sutphin v. Commonwealth, Va. App. 241, 243, 337 S.E.2d 897, 898 (1985).
On November 2, 1983, Sandra Bridgeman, appellant’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sutphin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- Epperly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- McGhee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- Bishop v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Sims v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Cantrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Greene v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Harward v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- James v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Wilkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.