Legal Opinion

State v. Reyes

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 15, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KEEFE, J.A.D.

The issue to be decided on this appeal is whether the application of the February 26, 1998, Attorney General Interim Guidelines (February 1998 Guidelines), governing plea offers in Comprehensive Drug Reform Act (CDRA) cases, to defendant’s sentence violated the ex post facto clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions. See U.S. Const, art. I, § 10, cl. 1; N.J. Const, art. IV, § 7, H 3. We hold that it did not and affirm the sentence imposed.

Defendant was indicted on six counts for drug related offenses he allegedly committed on January…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FowlkesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API