Legal Opinion

State v. Kanieski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The writ of comm nobis is a common-law remedy of very narrow scope in this state and was given statutory recognition and preserved by sec. 958.07, Stats., in 1949. In the recent case of Fritz v. State (1964), 25 Wis. (2d) 91, 95, 130 N. W. (2d) 279, we stated:

“The type of error that may be reached by comm nobis was comprehensively considered in Houston v. State wherein it was stated:
“ ‘An error to constitute a ground for the granting of the writ of coram nobis must not only be unknown to the court but would have prevented the judgment of the court. . . . Unless it clearly appears that an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Burnett v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In re ErnstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Wolke v. FlemingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mikulovsky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Ex Rel. Terry v. SchubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Furlong v. Waukesha County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. SchillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Jessen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API