Beckstead v. Gee
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
In limine we are met with a motion to dismiss the appeal because one of the sureties on the appeal bond was and is a married woman.
This court has held that under such circumstances the undertaking is not merely defective or insufficient but is void. (Farnsworth v. Viet, 39 Ida. 40, 225 Pac. 1023, such principle being approved in Strickfadden v. Greencreek Highway Dist., 44 Ida. 751, 260 Pac. 431.)
If a bond is void, only the filing of a valid bond within the statutory time (secs. 11-202, 11-203, I. C. A.) would protect and' perfect the appeal. If merely defective or insufficient, the defect or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Nash v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Bank of Commerce, Ltd. v. BaldwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Andrews v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Overland National Bank v. HalvestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loomis v. GrayIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Coffin v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Craig v. LaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Craig v. LaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1939