Legal Opinion

Craig v. Lane

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1939No. 6612Published

1Opinion of the Court

GIYENS, J. —

Respondents move to dismiss this appeal because one of the sureties on the appeal bond was at the time and is now concededly a married woman. The bond does not recite that it was given for her own use and benefit or for the use and benefit of or in connection with her separate property, but in opposition to the motion to dismiss, appellant presents her affidavit confirming that she is a married woman, asserting that she is a resident and freeholder of Canyon county, worth the amount of the undertaking, and further states:

“ .... Lewis Craig, also a signer of said bond, is a son of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Minor v. HappersettSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Maxwell v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API