Legal Opinion

Carey v. Dimidjian

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided October 29, 1998No. 11-97-00101-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DICKENSON, Justice.

Jimmy Carey filed suit on January 26, 1994, against his podiatrist, Carlos A. Dimid- jian, D.P.M., for treatments beginning in 1990. Defendant filed a “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment” as to all treatments which were performed more than two years before the lawsuit was filed. On August 12, 1996, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. That cause of action was not severed from the other claims asserted by plaintiff, and the trial court’s order contained the additional provision that: “All other relief not expressly granted in this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. MurdockTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kaigler v. General Electric Mortgage Insurance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  5. Pena v. Valley Sandia, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Industries, Inc. v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1999
  2. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API