Suburban Investment Co. v. City of Atlanta
Supreme Court of Georgia
Petition for injunction. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. May I, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The plaintiff brought a petition to enjoin the City of Atlanta, and the other defendants in error as agents and officers of the city, from proceeding to condemn certain land belonging to the plaintiff, for sewer purposes. A temporary restraining order was granted, but upon'the hearing the court refused to grant *594an interlocutory injunction. To this judgment the plaintiff excepted.
The charter of the City of Atlanta, as amended by the act of 1889 (Acts 1889, p. 956, see. 6), provides, in part, as follows: “That, the construction of all sewers under this act shall be provided for by ordinance.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frank v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Bridwell v. Gate City Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- D'Antignac v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1861
- Pruden v. LoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Keller v. Bowen & ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Marietta v. SummerourSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Marist Society of Georgia v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Thomas v. City of CairoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- City of Douglas v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.