Legal Opinion

Bland v. White

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

As the amended answer was served on September 19, 1930, more than ten days prior to the service of the notice of motion, the present application must be denied in so far as it seeks to dismiss the counterclaim, under rule 109 of the Rules *716of Civil Practice, as insufficient and as improperly interposed. The same disposition must be made of that branch of the motion which asks that the counterclaim be dismissed under rule 110 of the Rules of Civil Practice, as res adjudicata, that rule also requiring that the pleading be attacked within ten days after its service. That portion of the motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirschbaum v. . EschmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Honsinger v. . Union Carriage Gear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Monica Realty Corp. v. BleeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. D. & G. Girl Coat Co. v. KafkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Baldwin Building & Loan Ass'n v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlas Credit Corp. v. EzrineNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Morris v. DouglassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of LichtmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API