Legal Opinion

McCall v. Mareino

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2000No. 76552PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James D. Sweeney, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Walter McCall and Margaret Ellis appeal from the denial of their alternatively phrased motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for new trial. 1 See Civ.R. 59(A)(4), (6) and (7). 2 For the reasons adduced below, we affirm.

A review of the record on appeal indicates that on January 31, 1994, at approximately 7:00 a.m., McCall was driving his automobile along Ivanhoe Road in Cleveland, Ohio, at approximately twenty-five miles per hour. Ellis was a passenger in McCall’s vehicle. At that point, according to McCall, a vehicle operated by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ragone v. Vitali & Beltrami, Jr., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McWreath v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Shaw Steel, Inc. v. Ronfeldt Mfg., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Sims v. DiblerOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. McCabe v. Sitar, 06 Be 39 (6-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Riedel v. Akron Gen. Health Sys., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API