Legal Opinion
National Federation of the Blind v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 17, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-04086 NCPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 25
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge
The National Federation of the Blind of California and three individuals allege that Uber and its California subsidiaries discriminate against blind persons by refusing to transport guide dogs. Plaintiffs charge that Uber’s practices violate the Americans with Disabilities Act, the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the California Disabled Persons Act. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to establish standing and failure to state a claim, and also move for a more definite…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lowell v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Brooke v. PetersonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Betancourt-Colon v. Puerto Rico Convention Center District AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
- Central Valley Eden Environmental Defenders, LLC v. Airgas USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.