Legal Opinion
Malone v. McHugh
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 2, 1991No. CV 91-2416 (ADS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The remaining defendants in this action move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of: (1) failure to file a notice of claim; (2) statute of limitations; (3) res *155judicata and collateral estoppel; (4) failure to state a cause of action; and (5) lack of a genuine material issue as to any material fact. The defendants also move for costs and Rule 11 sanctions. The plaintiff cross-moves for an order “restraining defendants and their attorneys form [sic]…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jeffrey Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, Inc., William Miller, Louis Ceccoli, and Stanley StephensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cohen v. Pearl River Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heron v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Malone v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Malone v. County Of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Heron v. StraderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000