Legal Opinion

Layman v. Layman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1987No. 86-269PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

The issues presented by this appeal of a divorce suit are 1) whether stock in a family corporation was a gift to the husband, 2) whether the increased value of that stock became marital property and 3) whether an alimony allowance was adequate. We affirm on points 1 and 3 and reverse on point 2.

Carol and Joe Layman divorced after thirty-one years of marriage. Mrs. Layman was a housewife and the mother of three children. Mr. Layman has worked entirely for Layman’s, Incorporated, a hardware and furniture business founded some forty years ago by his parents, though not…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Hull v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Cockrill v. CockrillArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of KomnickIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. McKay v. McKaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API