Layman v. Layman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
The issues presented by this appeal of a divorce suit are 1) whether stock in a family corporation was a gift to the husband, 2) whether the increased value of that stock became marital property and 3) whether an alimony allowance was adequate. We affirm on points 1 and 3 and reverse on point 2.
Carol and Joe Layman divorced after thirty-one years of marriage. Mrs. Layman was a housewife and the mother of three children. Mr. Layman has worked entirely for Layman’s, Incorporated, a hardware and furniture business founded some forty years ago by his parents, though not…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Hull v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cockrill v. CockrillArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Marriage of KomnickIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- McKay v. McKaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.