Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. Turner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Sao District Court. Action to recover of the defendants, who are husband and wife, for necessaries furnished the family. Mrs. Turner demurred to the petition, and the demurrer was overruled, and she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

i. husband and wife : family expense: note wIfe’sSHauno/iimitations. It is, in substance, stated in the petition that the plaintiff from October, 1865, until May, 1877, furnished medicine and medical services for the family of the defendants, and that the same were a proper 1 I an(^ necessai7 family expense; that the same, in accordance with the usual custom, was charged to the appellant’s husband; that in 1878 the latter gave the. plaintiff his note for the balance due, payable in one jmar. This action was commenced in 1884, and the only ground upon which it is insisted that the court erred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frost v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Lawrence v. SinnamonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Davidson v. BiggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Polly v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Apuzzo v. HoerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. McCartney & Sons' Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Littell v. MintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Phillips v. KirbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Lewis v. LynchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API