Legal Opinion

Hay v. Union Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 28, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Coóke, J., June Term, 1914, of 'Wake.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, 0. J.

The plaintiffs T. T. Hay & Bro., on behalf of themselves and all other creditors, bring this, action against the Monongahela Underwriters’ Agency, the American Union Fire Insurance Company, and the United States Fidelity Guaranty Company, for the appointment of a receiver on the ground of insolvency of said insurance companies and to subject the bond of $10,000 given by the -said guaranty company, in lien of the deposit required by law, to the payment of the debts of the insurance companies. Murray Allen, Esq., was appointed referee. The court overruled all exceptions to his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Blalock v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ins. Co. v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bushnell, Receiver v. KRAFFTIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Moren v. Ohio Valley Fire & Marine Insurance Company's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Ins. Co. v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Johnson v. ButtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  5. Union Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Insurance Budget Plan, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API