Legal Opinion
Zegarelli v. Hughes
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 2004PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
R.S. Smith, J.
CPLR 3101 (i) provides that “[t]here shall be full disclosure of any films, photographs, video tapes or audio tapes” showing the activities of a party to litigation. We hold here that the “full disclosure” required by this statute is simply the disclosure normally required by the CPLR for relevant, non-privileged materials. More specifically, we hold that defendant here complied with his obligation to disclose a videotape by delivering a complete copy of the tape to plaintiffs counsel well in advance of trial. Defendant was not required, as a precondition to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Tai Tran v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Zegarelli v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by43 opinions
- Diamond Offshore Servs. Ltd. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- The People v. Chris PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. FranzeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- National Center for Crisis Management, Inc. v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.