Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 23, 1994No. 237, 1993PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we consider whether the Superior Court erred in admitting against defendant below-appellant John M. Smith (“Smith”) testimony of Jeanine Weedon (“Mrs. Weedon”), the wife of codefendant below William Weedon, Jr. (‘Weedon”). In relevant part, the testimony recounted a conversation Weedon had with Mrs. Weedon on October 10, 1992, that implicated Smith in the subject offenses. For the reasons below, we hold that the Superior Court committed plain error by admitting the pertinent testimony and therefore REVERSE Smith’s convictions and REMAND the case to the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API