Legal Opinion

Barton v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 19, 2002No. Civ.A. 00-0174(RMU)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying in part and Granting in part Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s Motion for Leave to Withdraw and to Stay the Proceedings; Denying Plaintiff Barton’s Motion to Stay the Proceedings

URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw and to stay the proceedings and on plaintiff C. Peyton Barton’s motion to stay the proceedings. C. Michael Tarone and John F. Karl, Jr. move to withdraw as the plaintiffs’ attorneys pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.6(c) and for a stay of the proceedings pending the outcome of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. David Dellinger v. John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Barton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  5. Lieberman v. Polytop Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Partridge v. Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing, Inc. v. WoodhouseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Sabre International Security v. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Laster v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API