Legal Opinion

Shinrone Farms, Inc. v. Gosch

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 19, 1982No. 66381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

Plaintiff, Shinrone Farms, Inc. (Shin-rone), obtained a writ of mandamus ordering defendants Sac County, and its board of supervisors, auditor and treasurer, to honor and pay Shinrone’s claim for brucellosis indemnity pursuant to chapter 164, The Code. Defendants urge reversal of trial court’s order on the theory that chapter 164 does not permit payment of most of plaintiff’s claim because there was an inadequate sum of money in the county brucellosis eradication fund in the fiscal year the claim was certified. We find no error and affirm the court’s order.

This case began…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Eggman v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Fevold v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. T & K Roofing Co. v. Iowa Department of EducationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Amended August 22, 2017 Tom Brakke and Rhonda Brakke D/B/A/ Pine Ridge Hunting Lodge, and McBra, Inc. Vs. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Iowa Natural Resource CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Southern Neb. v. Neb. Elec. GenerationNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Southern Nebraska Rural Public Power District v. Nebraska Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Tom Brakke and Rhonda Brakke D/B/A/ Pine Ridge Hunting Lodge, and McBra, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Iowa Natural Resource CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API