Legal Opinion

Baker v. Amazon Logistics, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 19, 2025No. 2:23-cv-03991Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TAMEICA BAKER, ET AL. * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO. 23-3991 AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. * SECTION “M” (2) ORDER AND REASONS Pending before me is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Status Conference. ECF No. 138. Defendants Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. (collectively, “Amazon”) timely filed an Opposition Memorandum. ECF No. 140. Plaintiffs timely filed a Reply Memorandum. ECF No. 141. No party requested oral argument in accordance with Local Rule 78.1, and the court agrees that oral argument is unnecessary. Having considered the record, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brazos River Authority v. GE Ionics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Resolution Trust Corporation, in Its Capacity as Receiver of First Bankers Trust and Savings Association, F.A. v. Southern Union Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Robinson v. Nexion Health at Terrell, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API