Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Zietek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 7, 1998, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a temporary typist, worked for two days until she left her employment due to dissatisfaction with her position. Claimant contended that she left her employment because of a *658client who would yell and shout obscene language. Thereafter, claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits and was found to be disqualified from receiving benefits…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of SistiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of El NachefAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of RindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API