Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 26, 1992No. 91-2280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting appellee Michael Adams’ motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 3.190(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court found that appellee’s due process rights had been violated as the result of the Kissimmee Police Department entering into a substantial assistance agreement with one Kelley Jo Easterling. We reverse.

On November 24, 1991, appellee was charged with a violation of section 893.135, Florida Statutes (1989), knowingly selling, delivering or possessing more than twenty-eight grams but less than 200 grams of a mixture…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GlossonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. AndersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. State v. BrugmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SargentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. SargentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API