Legal Opinion
Tesfaye, Fasil v. Carr Park Inc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 31, 2000No. 00-7078PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (1994), defendant petitions for leave to appeal .an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs Title VII claim. Defendant’s petition was untimely, therefore we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction,
L
Plaintiff, Fasil Tesfaye, was employed by defendant, Carr Park, Inc., as a facilities manager. On November 12, 1998, Carr Park fired Tesfaye. Subsequently, Tesfaye filed a charge with the EEOC, on April 20, 1999, claiming that Carr Park had discriminatorily fired him based on his race and national…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Miguel Antonio Aparicio v. Swan Lake, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle, Etc., Third Party v. Panama Canal Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Martini v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Raul F. Rodriguez v. Banco Central, Raul Rodriguez Rodriguez v. Banco Central Corporation, Raul F. Rodriguez v. Banco CentralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Myles v. LaffitteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Tranello v. FreyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Energy Policy Development GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Quarles v. General Investment & Development Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Thomas v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- State v. MulliganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Manu Kennedy v. Murial BowserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.