Legal Opinion
California v. Randtron
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 12, 1999No. CIV-S-98-0620 DFL DADPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
The City of Lodi and the People of the State of California (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Lodi”) brought this environmental action involving groundwater pollution against defendant Randtron and its predecessors and successors in interest. After Lodi entered into a settlement agreement with Randtron and Wausau Insurance Co, one of Randtron’s primary insurers, the court issued a Consent Decree and Final Judgment incorporating the agreement. Lodi subsequently brought suit in state court against Randtron in an effort to reach its…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- California v. RandtronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Huston v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
- California v. RandtronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- California Chamber of Commerce v. BontaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Huston v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.