Legal Opinion
California v. Randtron
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 19, 2002No. Nos. 99-17572, 00-16236PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed October 2, 2001, appearing at 268 F.3d 891, is amended as follows:
*9721. Slip Opinion, p. 14086 [268 F.3d at 895], second full paragraph — change to read: “Because the district court properly-applied the Anti-Injunction Act, and Randtron had no ...”
2. Slip Opinion, p. 14089 n. 7 [268 F.3d at 897] — change to read: “Randtron does not raise an Anti-Injunction Act challenge to the May 25, 2000 order, recognizing that it falls ...”
With this amendment, the panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Chief Judge Schroeder and Judge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Leroy JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Gates v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Flanagan v. ArnaizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Kelly v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- G.C. And K.B. Investments, Inc., a Louisiana Corporation v. Stuart Wilson Irene WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Negrete v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Arrow Gear Co. v. Downers Grove Sanitary DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- George v. City of Morro Bay (In Re George)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jeff D. v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.