Legal Opinion

Hauer v. Hauer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1922No. File No. 4879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from- Circuit Court, Grant County. Hon. Frank Anderson, Judge. On rehearing. (4) To point four of tire opinion, Appellant cited: Hill v-Davis, L. R. A. (N. S.) 1918B, 687.

1Opinion of the CourtGate'S, P. J.

[1] This cause is before us on rehearing granted. The former opinion and dissenting opinion are found in 44 &. D. 375, 184 N. W. 1. The sentence from the majority-opinion quoted in the dissenting opinion did not correctly state the facts. The statement of facts in regard thereto found in the dissenting opinion is correct.

[2] Three principal questions are presented for consideration. The first relates to the due execution, publication, and attestation of the will. The will in question was signed by testatrix in July, 1909. The trial in circuit court occurred in April, 1920, nearly 11 years…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ross v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Williams v. MalmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In re the Estate of SearsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1900
  4. Hauer v. HauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Rowland's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re Houda's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ryan v. ChicoineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. In Re Ryan's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Mahlman v. KratzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API