State v. McCullough

Defendants were jointly indicted for robbery, committed upon M. A. De Jean, on June 2,1928, and appeal from a sentence, based upon a conviction on that charge. Defendants were tried together; no severance having been requested. While both contended that they were not guilty, their defenses were different. McCullough’s defense was an alibi, and Pearson’s was that he was not particeps criminis in the robbery, but was one of the victims robbed. The record is somewhat confusing, due to- the fact that, in some instances, evidence is attached to bills that has no apparent bearing on the bill to…